Yes, absolutely – but as a practice tool, not as a textbook.
| You should buy Kiran if… | You should skip Kiran if… | |--------------------------|----------------------------| | You have already studied basic concepts. | You are starting from zero and know no formulas. | | You want to practice 10,000+ PYQs. | You prefer video lectures over books. | | You are preparing in Hindi or bilingual medium. | You want only online mocks (use Testbook/Gradeup instead). |
Recommended combination for a selected candidate:
Kiran publishes multiple books. For CGL, the most useful are: Ssc Cgl Kiran Publication Book
| Book Title | Covers | Best for | | --- | --- | --- | | SSC CGL Tier 1 & 2 – Previous Years’ Solved Papers (Topic-wise) | All 4 sections – English, Maths, Reasoning, GA | Understanding frequently repeated concepts | | SSC CGL Tier 1 – 25+ Solved Papers (Year-wise) | Full-length mock practice | Time management & exam simulation | | SSC CGL Tier 2 – Maths + English (Separate volumes) | Advanced Maths, Comprehension, Vocabulary | Tier 2 depth |
✅ Recommendation: Buy the “Topic-wise Solved Papers (1999–2025)” first. It organizes questions by subtopic (e.g., Trigonometry, Blood Relations, Idioms).
If you want, I can list chapter-wise features for a specific edition (provide edition/year) or compare this book to another SSC CGL guide. Yes, absolutely – but as a practice tool,
Kiran Publication books are widely regarded as a staple for SSC CGL preparation, primarily due to their extensive compilation of previous year questions (PYQs) categorized by topic and type
. While they are highly recommended for practice, users frequently report issues with physical book quality and occasional errors in solutions. General Verdict
Students who have completed their basic concepts and need heavy practice with actual exam patterns. Key Advantage: Kiran publishes multiple books
Detailed "Type-wise" categorization helps students identify recurring patterns in SSC exams. Main Drawback:
Books are extremely thick and can be intimidating; paper quality is often reported as thin or fragile. Subject-Specific Analysis