Mortdecai < UHD — 2K >

In the sprawling pantheon of literary detectives, spies, and rogues, most fit neatly into archetypes. We have the brooding genius (Sherlock Holmes), the suave gentleman (James Bond), and the hard-boiled cynic (Sam Spade). And then, teetering precariously somewhere between a Cognac-induced stupor and a masterpiece forgery, we have Mortdecai.

For the uninitiated, the name Mortdecai—specifically the Honourable Charles Mortdecai—usually elicits one of two reactions: a blank stare or an involuntary grimace referencing the 2015 film flop. However, to the devoted niche of readers who discovered the work of Kyril Bonfiglioli, Mortdecai is nothing short of a genius-level disaster artist. This article dives deep into the yellowed pages of the novels, the controversial Hollywood adaptation, and the strange, misanthropic charm that keeps Mortdecai relevant decades after his creation.

It began, as these things so often do, with a woman, a wager, and a regrettable amount of chilled Sauternes.

I, Charles Mortdecai—art dealer, rogue, and, on this particular Tuesday, reluctant detective—was reclining in my Mayfair townhouse, attempting to explain to my manservant, Jock, that a velvet smoking jacket is not “dressing like a plumped-up magpie” but rather “a tribute to the dusky opulence of the Venetian twilight.” Jock, who has the aesthetic sensitivity of a startled bulldog, merely grunted and polished a silver salvo with increasing violence.

“A lady to see you, sir,” he announced, his tone suggesting the lady in question was likely carrying a subpoena.

She was, in fact, carrying considerably more. Lady Annabel Spode swept into the room like a winter storm in diamonds. Tall, imperious, and possessed of a jawline that had launched a thousand regimental bets, she fixed me with a gaze that could curdle cream at forty paces.

“Mortdecai. I need a forgery.”

“My dear lady,” I said, smoothing my mustache—a magnificent handlebar creation that deserves its own postcode. “You flatter me. But I deal in authentic masterpieces. Usually ones that have recently fallen off the back of a lorry.”

“I don’t want a painting. I want a lobster.”

Jock paused his polishing. “Called it,” he muttered.

The story, as it spilled forth, was pure vintage Spode. Her husband, Lord Algernon Spode, had lost the family’s heirloom—a solid-gold, jewel-encrusted lobster named “Claudius” (don’t ask)—to a nefarious Cornish smuggler-turned-casino-owner called Silas “The Eel” Tremayne. The wager had taken place at Tremayne’s floating casino, the Mermaid’s Revenge, moored off St. Ives. Algernon, three sheets to the wind and convinced he could beat a man who literally cheated gravity, had staked Claudius against a crate of Tremayne’s “prize-winning” pasties.

He lost. Obviously.

Annabel needed a replica—a perfect, undetectable fake—to swap back before Algernon’s mother, the Dowager Duchess, noticed the lobster’s absence during the annual “Crustacean Gala” (a real event, I assure you, as tedious as it sounds). mortdecai

“The fee,” she said, placing a small velvet pouch on the table. The clink inside was the sound of my next three mortgages dissolving.

“Jock,” I said, rising. “Pack the tweed. And the small crowbar. We’re going to Cornwall.”


Cornwall, I discovered, is damp. It is also full of people who say “me ‘ansome” and mean something vaguely threatening. Tremayne’s casino was a rotting paddle-steamer painted gold, moored in a foggy estuary. Inside, the air smelled of desperation, cheap perfume, and slightly-off scallops.

I located Tremayne himself at a roulette table. He had the face of a friendly undertaker—all oiled charm and hidden calipers. His fingers, when he raked in chips, moved like a pianist playing a concerto of theft.

“Mr. Mortdecai,” he said, without looking up. “The man who once sold a fake Canaletto to the Vatican. I’ve heard of you.”

“Acquired,” I corrected, smoothing my mustache. “The Vatican has a very generous return policy.”

Over brandies that tasted of regret, I proposed a trade: a painting from my personal collection—a minor but authentic Corot—in exchange for Claudius the Lobster. Tremayne’s eyes glittered. He agreed. That was my first mistake.

My second was leaving Jock alone with the casino’s “complimentary” shellfish platter.

The swap was set for midnight in the casino’s humidarium—a glass-domed room full of tropical ferns and the world’s most depressed parrots. I brought the Corot. Tremayne brought the lobster. Claudius sat on a velvet cushion, his ruby eyes gleaming, his gold claws frozen in a gesture of eternal, crustacean disdain.

As I reached for the lobster, Tremayne snapped his fingers. The lights went out.

When they came back on, the Corot was gone. The lobster was gone. And in their place was a single, glistening, very real lobster—alive, furious, and somehow holding my wallet in its smaller claw.

“That’s not Claudius,” I said.

“No,” Tremayne agreed, stepping out of the shadows with a revolver. “That’s Kevin. He’s my pet. And you, Mortdecai, have just admitted to possessing a forgery. Because the painting you brought? It’s the fake. The real Corot is in my safe. And now I have you for fraud.”

He had me. It was, I admit, a neat trap. Except for one thing.

The back wall of the humidarium exploded inward.

Jock burst through the shattered glass, covered in seaweed, holding a fire extinguisher in one hand and a half-eaten pasty in the other. He had, as he later explained, “followed the smell of treachery.” Also, he’d been locked in the kitchen after insulting the chef’s crab bisque. The fire extinguisher was acquired during his escape.

What followed was not elegant. Jock sprayed Tremayne in the face with foam, Kevin the Lobster clamped onto Tremayne’s nose, and I—with considerable dignity—scooped up the fake Claudius (which, upon inspection, was actually the real one; Tremayne had swapped them earlier that evening, the clever eel) and made for the exit.

We escaped via the lifeboat, rowing furiously as the Mermaid’s Revenge drifted toward a submerged rock. Behind us, Tremayne’s screams were muffled by foam and crustacean.


Back in Mayfair, Lady Annabel examined Claudius. “It’s exquisite,” she breathed.

“The real one,” I said. “Tremayne never had the genuine article. Algernon lost a fake. He’d had it copied years ago. The real lobster has been in your attic the whole time, gathering dust behind the croquet set.”

She stared. “How do you know?”

“Because,” I said, pouring myself a large whisky, “I made the fake. Fifteen years ago. For Algernon’s father. The old rogue.”

And with that, I retrieved my Corot—which I had, of course, also swapped earlier that day for a very convincing poster of a bowl of fruit—and retired to my study.

Jock brought me a fresh Sauternes. “So we stole a lobster that was already theirs, swapped a painting that was already ours, and ruined a casino owner’s evening for no reason.” In the sprawling pantheon of literary detectives, spies,

“No reason?” I said, gesturing to the velvet pouch on the desk. “My dear Jock. The reason is sitting right there. Also, I’ve always wanted to see a man get bitten on the nose by a crustacean. Tick that one off the list.”

Jock grunted. But I swear—just for a moment—the corner of his mouth twitched.

It might have been the Sauternes. But I prefer to think it was admiration.


No cult film survives without quotable dialogue. Mortdecai has a surprising amount.


If you are ready to join the cult, Mortdecai is readily available.


We live in an era of peak prestige television. We watch shows about tortured lawyers, morally grey drug lords, and cutthroat CEOs. We have become exhausted by "serious" anti-heroes (Walter White, Don Draper) who are actually just depressed.

Mortdecai offers the purest form of escapism: the idiotic aristocrat. He is the anti-anti-hero. He doesn’t struggle with his conscience because he doesn’t have one. Reading a Mortdecai novel is like drinking a pint of absinthe while listening to a drunk history professor rant about the fall of the Roman Empire. It is intellectually stimulating, morally depraved, and deeply funny.

Furthermore, the Mortdecai IP is ripe for a renaissance. With the success of shows like The Gentlemen (Guy Ritchie) and The White Lotus (satirizing the wealthy), a streaming series adaptation of Mortdecai would be perfect. Imagine a 10-episode run on HBO or Netflix: each season adapting one of the three novels, shooting in gritty 1970s locations, casting a stage actor (not a movie star) like Matthew Rhys or Dan Stevens to play the mustachioed menace. A limited series could capture the Bonfiglioli tone—dialogue-driven, cynical, and violently absurd—in a way a 90-minute film never could.

Films like The Big Lebowski and Showgirls took years to find their audience. Mortdecai is on that same trajectory, albeit with a much lower ceiling. Here is why the Mortdecai fanbase is growing.

For a decade, Mortdecai was a secret handshake among bookish cynics. Then, in 2015, Hollywood happened. Directed by David Koepp and starring Johnny Depp (as Mortdecai), Gwyneth Paltrow (as Johanna), and Ewan McGregor (as the long-suffering Inspector Martland), the film was intended to launch a franchise.

It did not.

The Mortdecai movie was savaged by critics. It holds a 12% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. It grossed a mere $47 million worldwide against a $60 million budget. Superficially, the film is a disaster. Depp’s accent wanders across the British Isles, the mustache is prosthetic (and looks it), and the tone veers wildly between slapstick and action-adventure. Cornwall, I discovered, is damp

However, time has been surprisingly kind to the Mortdecai film. Why? Because it is weird. In an era of soulless Marvel quips and algorithmic Netflix thrillers, the Mortdecai movie is aggressively bizarre. It feels like a $60 million student film made by someone who adored Peter Sellers but had an unlimited budget.

Critics hated that Mortdecai was "unlikeable." But that is the point. The film faithfully captures the book’s central thesis: Charlie Mortdecai is a terrible human being. The film bombed because audiences expected a charming rogue like Jack Sparrow; instead, they got a snobbish, misogynistic, cowardly toff. But for the cultists, that is precisely why the Mortdecai film is now a midnight movie classic in the making.