Iec 62304 Checklist Xls Info

If you hand an auditor a chaotic binder, you will fail. Here is how the IEC 62304 Checklist XLS saves you:

Failure #1: Lack of Traceability

Failure #2: Forgetting Class C Specifics

Failure #3: Uncontrolled Changes


This matrix dictates which clauses are mandatory based on your classification. In your XLS, use this as a filter key.

| Process Area | Clause | Requirement Name | Class A | Class B | Class C | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Documentation | 4.1 | Software Development Plan | Required | Required | Required | | Documentation | 5.1 | Software Requirements Specification (SRS) | Required | Required | Required | | Architecture | 5.2 | Software Architectural Design | Required | Required | Required | | Architecture | 5.3 | Software Detailed Design | Not Required | Required | Required | | Implementation | 5.4 | Implementation (Source Code) | Required | Required | Required | | V&V | 5.5 | Unit Testing | Not Required | Required | Required | | V&V | 5.6 | Integration Testing | Required | Required | Required | | V&V | 5.7 | System Testing | Required | Required | Required | | Release | 5.8 | Software Release | Required | Required | Required | | Maintenance | 6.1 | Maintenance Plan | Required | Required | Required | | Config Mgmt | 8.1 | Configuration Management Plan | Required | Required | Required |


You might ask: Why not use expensive ALM tools? While tools like Jira or Polarion are powerful, an Excel checklist remains the industry standard for small to mid-sized companies for three reasons:

A properly built IEC 62304 XLS checklist serves as your Master Verification Matrix.


| Clause | Activity / Requirement | Class A | Class B | Class C | Evidence / Artifact | Status | Comments | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 4.3 | Software safety classification | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Classification report | ⬜ | | | 5.1 | Software development plan | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Development plan | ⬜ | | | 5.1.2 | Software life cycle model defined | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Life cycle description | ⬜ | | | 5.1.3 | Tailoring of activities | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Tailoring justification | ⬜ | | | 5.2 | Software requirements analysis | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Software requirements spec (SRS) | ⬜ | | | 5.2.6 | Risk control measures in requirements | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | SRS + risk traceability | ⬜ | | | 5.3 | Software architectural design | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Architecture design document | ⬜ | | | 5.3.4 | Identify SOUP items | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | SOUP list & risk assessment | ⬜ | | | 5.3.5 | Define segregation for risk control | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Architecture description | ⬜ | | | 5.4 | Software detailed design (unit design) | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | Detailed design doc | ⬜ | | | 5.5 | Software unit implementation | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | Code / unit implementation | ⬜ | | | 5.6 | Software integration & integration testing | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Integration plan & test results | ⬜ | | | 5.7 | Software system testing | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | System test plan, cases, reports | ⬜ | | | 5.7.2 | Test risk controls | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Test traceability to risks | ⬜ | | | 5.8 | Software release | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Release notes & readiness review | ⬜ | | | 6.1 | Software maintenance plan | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Maintenance plan | ⬜ | | | 6.2 | Problem resolution process | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Bug tracking / CAPA records | ⬜ | | | 6.3 | Change request process | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Change control records | ⬜ | | | 7.1 | Risk management process (ISO 14971) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Risk management file | ⬜ | | | 7.2 | Risk analysis of software hazards | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Hazard analysis / FMEA | ⬜ | | | 7.3 | Evaluate risk control measures | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Risk trace matrix | ⬜ | | | 8.1 | Software configuration management | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | CM plan & version control | ⬜ | | | 8.2 | Problem resolution & traceability | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Problem reports & trend logs | ⬜ | | | 9.1 | Software verification plan | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Verification plan | ⬜ | | | 9.2 | Verification activities (reviews, tests) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Review & test records | ⬜ | | | 9.3 | Traceability from requirements to tests | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Trace matrix | ⬜ | | | 9.4 | Software validation plan (user needs) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Validation plan & report | ⬜ | | | Annex B | Documentation structure checklist | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Doc index / DHF | ⬜ | |


| Activity | Sub-activity | Class A | Class B | Class C | Method | Traceability | Status | | :--- | :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Unit verification | Test cases | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | Automated/Manual | → Design spec | | | | Coverage (MC/DC) | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ | Analysis | | | | Integration verification | Interface testing | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | Black/gray box | → Architecture | | | System testing | Functional testing | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | Manual/Auto | → SRS | | | | Performance testing | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | Benchmark | | | | | Stress/load testing | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ | Simulation | | | | Regression testing | After change | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | Selective/full | → Change log | |


Below is a structured, comprehensive IEC 62304 compliance checklist you can paste into an Excel file. Each row represents one checklist item with suggested columns for tracking status, evidence, owner, and notes. Use the "Status" column values: Not Started / In Progress / Complete / Not Applicable. Adjust or remove columns to match your project process.

Columns (place in row 1):

Checklist rows (start at row 2):

1, 4.1, "Establish software lifecycle processes", Management, "Define, document and maintain software development and maintenance processes", "Software Development Plan, Software Maintenance Plan, SOPs", "Plans approved by management; versioned", Not Started, QA Manager, , , Medium,

2, 4.2, "Assign roles and responsibilities", Management, "Document responsibilities for software lifecycle activities", "Organizational chart, RACI, role descriptions", "Roles assigned and communicated", Not Started, Project Manager, , , Low,

3, 4.3, "Software safety classification", Planning, "Classify software according to safety impact (Class A/B/C)", "Safety classification report, scoring rationale", "Classification justified per IEC 62304 definitions", Not Started, Safety Engineer, , , High,

4, 5.1, "Software development plan", Planning, "Create plan covering scope, lifecycle model, verification/validation, configuration management, risk management", "Software Development Plan (SDP)", "Plan reviewed and baseline established", Not Started, Project Manager, , , High,

5, 5.2, "Software requirements specification (SRS)", Requirements, "Document functional and non-functional S/W requirements traceable to system requirements", "SRS document, trace matrix", "All requirements uniquely identified and testable", Not Started, Systems Engineer, , , High,

6, 5.3, "Architectural design", Design, "Define high-level architecture, interfaces, modules, data flow", "Software architecture document, UML diagrams", "Architecture supports requirements and safety classification", Not Started, Lead Architect, , , High,

7, 5.4, "Detailed design", Design, "Specify module-level design to support implementation and verification", "Module design specs, data structures, algorithms", "Design complete and reviewable", Not Started, Developers, , , High,

8, 5.5, "Implementation", Implementation, "Implement software according to detailed design, coding standards", "Source code repository, coding standards, code comments", "Code compiles, unit tests available", Not Started, Dev Team, , , High,

9, 6.1, "Software unit testing", Verification, "Define and execute unit tests for individual modules", "Unit test cases, automated test results", "Coverage per plan; unit tests pass", Not Started, Dev Team, , , Medium,

10, 6.2, "Software integration testing", Verification, "Test integration of modules and interfaces", "Integration test plan, test reports", "All integration test cases passed", Not Started, Test Lead, , , Medium, Iec 62304 Checklist Xls

11, 6.3, "Software system testing", Verification, "Verify software meets SRS in system configuration", "System test plan, executed test reports", "System tests trace to SRS and pass", Not Started, QA, , , High,

12, 6.4, "Software release testing (acceptance)", Verification, "Perform release/acceptance testing with release criteria", "Acceptance test reports, release checklist", "Release approval recorded", Not Started, Release Manager, , , High,

13, 7.1, "Software maintenance process", Maintenance, "Plan and implement maintenance activities including problem resolution and change control", "Maintenance plan, change control procedure", "Issues tracked; changes controlled", Not Started, Maintenance Lead, , , Medium,

14, 7.2, "Problem resolution and tracking", Maintenance, "Record, investigate, and resolve software anomalies", "Issue tracking system, CAPA records", "All issues logged and dispositioned", Not Started, Support Lead, , , Medium,

15, 8.1, "Configuration management plan", CM, "Establish CM for software items: baselines, versioning, build control", "CM Plan, baselined repository", "Source, deliverables, and baselines controlled", Not Started, CM Manager, , , High,

16, 8.2, "Identification and control of baselines", CM, "Define items under configuration control and baselines", "Baseline records, change records", "Baselines approved and auditable", Not Started, CM Manager, , , High,

17, 8.3, "Build and release procedures", CM, "Define reproducible build and release processes", "Build scripts, release checklist, environment definitions", "Builds reproducible; release artifacts archived", Not Started, Release Engineer, , , High,

18, 8.4, "Software item traceability", Traceability, "Maintain bidirectional traceability between requirements, design, code, and tests", "Traceability matrix", "All SRS items traced to design, code, and tests", Not Started, QA, , , High,

19, 9.1, "Risk management integration", Risk, "Integrate ISO 14971-based risk management with software lifecycle", "Risk management plan, risk file (hazards, mitigations, residual risk)", "Risks identified, controls implemented and verified", Not Started, Risk Manager, , , High,

20, 9.2, "Identification of hazardous situations from software", Risk, "Document hazards contributed by software and risk acceptability", "Hazard log, FMEA/FMECA", "Hazards analyzed and mitigations assigned", Not Started, Safety Engineer, , , High,

21, 9.3, "Verification of safety-related requirements", Risk, "Verify that risk control measures are implemented correctly in software", "Verification test cases, results", "Safety functions verified per requirements", Not Started, Test Lead, , , High,

22, 10.1, "Software problem resolution process (post-market)", Post-market, "Process for receiving and acting on field issues and incidents", "Post-market surveillance plan, incident handling SOP", "Incidents tracked; corrective actions implemented", Not Started, Vigilance Lead, , , High,

23, 11.1, "Software tools qualification", Tools, "Identify and qualify software tools that can introduce or detect errors", "Tool qualification records, V-model for tools", "Tools categorized and qualified where required", Not Started, Tool Owner, , , Medium,

24, 11.2, "Libraries and third-party components", Tools, "Control and document use of 3rd-party software, open-source, and libraries", "Bill of materials, license records, vulnerability assessment", "Third-party components evaluated and accepted", Not Started, Dev Team, , , Medium,

25, 12.1, "Document control", Documentation, "Ensure controlled documents: versioning, approvals, distribution", "Document register, document control procedure", "Documents current and archived", Not Started, Document Controller, , , Low,

26, 12.2, "Record retention", Documentation, "Define retention periods and storage for lifecycle records", "Records retention schedule", "Records retained per regulatory requirements", Not Started, QA, , , Low,

27, 13.1, "Usability and human factors consideration", Usability, "Address user interface safety aspects and use-related risks", "Usability engineering file, use scenarios, validation", "Use errors analyzed and mitigations implemented", Not Started, UX Lead, , , Medium,

28, 14.1, "Security requirements for software", Security, "Define security requirements (authentication, access control, encryption)", "Security requirements spec, threat model", "Security requirements implemented and tested", Not Started, Security Engineer, , , High,

29, 14.2, "Vulnerability management", Security, "Process to identify, track and remediate security vulnerabilities", "Vulnerability log, patch management process", "Vulnerabilities assessed and remediated", Not Started, Security Team, , , High,

30, 15.1, "Verification of requirements, design, implementation", Verification, "Plan and perform verification activities throughout lifecycle", "Verification plan and reports", "Verification coverage meets plan", Not Started, QA, , , High,

31, 16.1, "Validation of software in intended environment", Validation, "Validate final software in intended use environment including clinical workflow", "Validation protocol, validation report", "Validation shows software meets user needs and intended use", Not Started, Validation Lead, , , High,

32, 16.2, "Acceptance criteria for validation", Validation, "Define measurable acceptance criteria for validation", "Validation acceptance criteria in protocol", "Criteria met and documented", Not Started, Validation Lead, , , High, If you hand an auditor a chaotic binder, you will fail

33, 17.1, "Supplier management", Supplier, "Assess and control suppliers for software components or services", "Supplier assessments, contracts, quality agreements", "Suppliers qualified and monitored", Not Started, Procurement, , , Medium,

34, 18.1, "Training and competency", Training, "Provide training for personnel on software lifecycle processes and tools", "Training records, competency matrix", "Personnel trained and records stored", Not Started, HR, , , Low,

35, 19.1, "Audit and internal review", Quality, "Plan and perform internal audits of software lifecycle processes", "Audit schedule, audit reports, corrective actions", "Findings closed within target", Not Started, QA Lead, , , Medium,

36, 20.1, "Regulatory reporting and compliance", Regulatory, "Ensure processes for regulatory submissions and reporting", "Regulatory submission artifacts, correspondence", "Regulatory requirements addressed", Not Started, Regulatory Affairs, , , High,

37, 21.1, "Change impact analysis", Change Control, "Assess impact of changes on safety, performance, and regulatory status", "Change request, impact assessment", "Impact documented and approved", Not Started, Change Board, , , High,

38, 21.2, "Regression testing for changes", Change Control, "Run regression tests when software changes are introduced", "Regression test suite, results", "No regressions in safety-critical functions", Not Started, Test Lead, , , High,

39, 22.1, "End-of-life planning", Maintenance, "Define software end-of-life and transition plans", "EOL policy, customer notifications plan", "EOL criteria and communication defined", Not Started, Product Manager, , , Low,

40, 23.1, "Record of decisions and rationale", Documentation, "Maintain decision logs for safety-critical design choices", "Decision log, meeting minutes", "Rationales traceable and auditable", Not Started, Project Manager, , , Medium,

41, 24.1, "Clinical evaluation inputs", Clinical, "Include clinical input where software affects clinical decisions", "Clinical evaluation report or literature review", "Clinical risks assessed", Not Started, Clinical Lead, , , High,

42, 25.1, "Software release notes and labeling", Release, "Prepare release notes, user manuals, labeling reflecting changes and safety information", "Release notes, instructions for use", "Documentation updated and reviewed", Not Started, Technical Writer, , , Medium,

43, 26.1, "Backup and restore for data integrity", Data, "Define backup and restore procedures to protect user/clinical data", "Backup SOPs, test restoration records", "Data restored successfully in test", Not Started, IT Ops, , , Medium,

44, 27.1, "Logging and monitoring", Operations, "Ensure adequate logging for safety events, performance, and security", "Logging policy, logs retention", "Logs available for investigation", Not Started, DevOps, , , Medium,

45, 28.1, "Performance and reliability requirements", Non-functional, "Define and verify performance, timing, and reliability requirements", "Performance test plan, results", "Meets performance acceptance criteria", Not Started, Performance Engineer, , , Medium,

46, 29.1, "Internationalization / localization considerations", Non-functional, "Address language/regulatory variations if applicable", "Localization plan, translated documents", "Localized versions validated", Not Applicable, Product Manager, , , Low,

47, 30.1, "Device-specific software considerations", Product, "Document any device/platform dependencies and constraints", "Platform compatibility matrix", "Compatibility tested and documented", Not Started, Engineering, , , Medium,

48, 31.1, "Traceability to system-level risk controls", Risk, "Ensure software contributes to and verifies system-level risk controls", "Trace matrix linking system risk controls to software functions", "All system risk controls implemented or noted as N/A", Not Started, Safety Engineer, , , High,

49, 32.1, "Evidence of management review", Management, "Periodic management reviews of software lifecycle status", "Management review minutes, action items", "Reviews performed per schedule", Not Started, QA Manager, , , Low,

50, 33.1, "Compliance gap analysis", Audit, "Perform gap analysis vs IEC 62304 and related standards (ISO 14971, IEC 62366, ISO 13485)", "Gap analysis report, remediation plan", "Gaps closed or tracked", Not Started, Compliance Lead, , , High,

Instructions for Excel formatting:

Optional additional sheets:

Use this checklist as a complete starting point; remove or adapt items not applicable to your product.

To create a functional IEC 62304 Compliance Checklist in Excel (XLS), your spreadsheet should be structured to map the standard's clauses against your software safety classification (A, B, or C) and your internal documentation. Recommended XLS Column Structure Failure #2: Forgetting Class C Specifics

A professional checklist typically uses these eight columns to ensure audit readiness: I. Reference: Clause number (e.g., 5.1.1). II. Software Lifecycle Process: Brief description of the requirement/task. III–V. Applicability (Class A, B, C): Mark "X" if the clause applies to that safety class. VI. Supporting Document(s): Name/ID of your internal SOP, Plan, or Report. VII. Specific Section: Exact page or section in your document for easy navigation. VIII. Status/Comments: Current compliance status (e.g., Compliant, Gap, N/A). Key Content for Checklist Rows

You should organize your rows by the five core process areas (Clauses 5–9): Process Area Key Checklist Items Development

Planning, requirements analysis, architecture design, unit implementation/verification, integration testing, system testing, and release. Maintenance

Post-release feedback monitoring, bug evaluation, and controlled change management. Risk Management

Software hazard analysis, risk control implementation, and verification of mitigations. Configuration

Identifying configuration items, version control, change control, and configuration audits. Problem Resolution

Tracking reports, root cause analysis, and documenting corrective actions. Important Implementation Details IEC 62304 QMS Checklist for Medical Software Teams

To achieve compliance with , your checklist must cover the five primary software life cycle processes defined in the standard. Because requirements vary by Software Safety Class (A, B, or C)

, an effective Excel (.xls) template should include a column for safety classification to filter relevant tasks. www.qualityfwd.com Core Processes Checklist

An IEC 62304 compliance checklist is typically structured around Clauses 5 through 9: Software Development Process (Clause 5): Define the development lifecycle, tools, and roles. Requirements Analysis:

Document functional, performance, and risk-related software requirements. Architecture & Design:

Create a blueprint of software units and their interactions. Implementation & Verification: Coding and testing (Unit, Integration, and System testing). Software Maintenance Process (Clause 6):

Establish procedures for tracking bugs, assessing impact of changes, and re-validating modified code. Software Risk Management (Clause 7):

Identify software-specific hazards and document risk control measures (must align with Software Configuration Management (Clause 8):

Control source code versions and manage the development environment. Software Problem Resolution (Clause 9):

Formalize how bugs are reported, analyzed for root causes, and resolved. www.qualityfwd.com Recommended Excel Template Columns

For a practical .xls tool, organize your spreadsheet with these headers: IEC 62304 QMS Checklist for Medical Software Teams

This is a structured IEC 62304:2006+AMD1:2015 checklist guide, formatted for easy translation into an Excel (.xls/.xlsx) workbook.

I have organized this into 5 main sheets within a single Excel file.


Before beginning the checklist, the Safety Class must be determined according to Clause 4.3.

| Class | Definition (Risk of Injury to Patient/Operator) | Documentation Requirement | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Class A | No possible injury. | Basic Documentation | | Class B | Possible non-serious injury. | Standard Documentation | | Class C | Possible serious injury or death. | Rigorous Documentation |


| ID | Clause | Activity / Checklist Item | Guidance Notes | Actionable Output | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | M1 | 6.1 | Is there a process for receiving feedback? | How are post-market issues fed back into dev? | Complaint Handling SOP | | M2 | 6.2 | Are problem reports analyzed? | Assess impact on safety and determine classification. | Problem Report Analysis | | C1 | 8.1 | Is a Configuration Management Plan in place? | How is version control, branching, and merging handled? | CM Plan | | C2 | 8.2 | Are change records maintained? | Who made the change, when, and why? | Version Control Logs | | C3 | 8.3 | Is configuration status accounting performed? | Can you identify the exact configuration of any released version? | Release Manifests |


Iec 62304 Checklist Xls Info

Iec 62304 Checklist Xls Info